Designing and Conducting the Survey (The Intranet Users Have Spoken...Part III)
see part I
see part II
I received an overwhelming response to my last two articles on the user survey and many readers wanted to know how the survey was designed, what types of questions were asked, and how the whole survey was administered. So, rather than answering a number of e-mails privately, I thought it would be best to share more details on this part of the survey experience with everyone.
Firstly, I. d be remiss if I did not mention the fact that I did not just dream up these questions on my own. The company. s Market Research Department helped me immensely with designing the actual survey questions, possible responses, and question type/formatting on paper. They are experts in doing this sort of thing and I. m certain my survey was a better one because of their expertise.
As I alluded to in the first article, since our Market Research Department was not experienced with doing electronic surveys, we first considered external research vendors. After determining that they were cost prohibitive, we looked to the web for software to do the survey for us. I evaluated several products and decided on Survey SaidÒ
(http://www.surveysaid.com), a product for creating, administering, and analyzing on-line surveys. I chose to use its HTML/Internet Survey offering for the intranet survey, but it does offer many other ways of conducting surveys (Java applet, PC based, diskettes, LANs, etc.). I was extremely pleased with the product as it gave my survey a more hi-tech look and feel and made it ridiculously easy to compile and analyze the results. In fact, it was so well received both by respondents and the Market Research Department, that I am in the process of assisting internal departments conduct additional surveys via the intranet. Just what I needed . another hat to wear!
After we developed the questions and question "types" on paper, I created the survey within the software, saved it, and chose the "Create Internet Survey" option. It generated an HTML form for the survey and I was ready to roll. I had already set up my web server with the cgi script needed to run the survey. It is because the survey is generated by the software that the results (from the flat file generated as each user answers the survey on the web) can be imported back into the software for easy analysis.
Here. s some of the questions we asked, their format, and the objective of each question:
|
Question |
Format |
Objective |
|
Name and Phone # |
Text Box |
Optional. Survey was essentially
anonymous but users had to give name and phone number if they
wanted to enter the DVD Drawing |
|
Please tell us your group (business) |
Radio Buttons |
To determine respondent rate by group
and extrapolate into which groups use the intranet the
most/least |
|
Where are you primarily located? |
Radio Buttons |
Determine where users are located
(Corporate HQ, Plants, Remote Dial-Up, etc.) |
|
How often do you use your PC? |
Radio Buttons |
Determine PC usage |
|
How would you describe your PC abilities? |
Radio Buttons |
Try and determine users. PC
abilities |
|
How often do you use the intranet? |
Radio Buttons |
Frequency of intranet usage |
|
Within your group, do you feel that the use of the intranet is Mandatory? Strongly encouraged? Somewhat encouraged? Not encouraged? |
Radio Buttons |
To cross-tabulate responses by
group/business and assess whether management is encouraging
users to use the intranet or not |
|
Rate the following current content in the areas of Importance and Satisfaction. (this was followed by a list of current content for example, press releases/news, discussion boards, HR information, response time& .) |
5 point scale for both Importance and
Satisfaction |
Perform gap analysis on current content
offerings |
|
Is there a reason that you do not use the intranet more often? |
Radio Buttons (choose all that apply)
with an "Other" for additional verbatim answers |
Determine why users do not use the
intranet more often. Try and categorize reasons by technical
(ex: access, response time), content reasons, training issues,
etc. |
|
What would make it worthwhile for you to use the intranet more often? |
Radio Buttons (choose all that apply)
with an "Other" for additional verbatim answers |
Get an idea of what users really want to
see |
|
What is your overall opinion of the intranet? |
Scroll Bar for Relative Impression
Rating |
Determine overall satisfaction with the
current intranet |
|
Comments/Suggestions |
Open ended verbatim |
Get individualized feedback,
suggestions |
Overall, respondents seemed to answer all or at least most of the 26 questions. The verbatim questions (the 2 "other" options and the last comments/suggestion) were very interesting to read and provided me a lot of insight and information. However, keep in mind that verbatim questions cannot be quantitatively analyzed by the software and are not nearly as easy to analyze as closed-ended questions. Therefore, I recommend using them sparingly.
Thanks to everyone for the overwhelming response to the survey articles. I hope this article answered most of the questions I received regarding how the survey was designed and what questions were asked. As always, if you have any comments, suggestions, or stories of your own to share, drop me a line at paulag@enter.net.
see part I
see part II
The Author
P.G. Daly is Webmaster for the intranet of a large durable goods manufacturing company. In addition, P.G. writes for several online publications and does freelance web design and consulting. P.G. welcomes your feedback at paulag@enter.net
.