Intranet Journal
The online resource for intranet professionals
"The Net is not like a brain!" I heard myself
arguing with more vigor than I'd intended.
Unfortunately, the person I chose to gainsay on this
topic had been introduced as a hedge fund manager
but turned out also to be a neuroscientist at the
University of California's Brain Imaging Center. He
knows the brain the way I know...well, I don't know
anything as well as he knows the brain. You'd be
surprised at how much I learned about the ways the
Net is indeed like a brain.
The scientist was joined by a hugely smart computer
industry analyst who also thinks the comparison is
fruitful. It was around the moment that the two of
them showed me that I was completely wrong that I
realized that I actually don't believe that dumb old
wrong thing. No, what I really believe is that the
problem isn't with the comparison to the brain, it's
with comparisons at all.
"So the Net's like a brain," I said, "but it's also
like the environment and it's also like an economy
and it's also like a party. Each of these may bring
us insights about the Net..."
The analyst agreed, but he still especially likes
the brain comparison because he can look at some
structure of the brain and gain insights into the
Net that he might otherwise have missed. It spurs
his imagination and his analytic insight as well.
But, if you push too hard on any one metaphor, you
can easily be led to think that because A is like B
in one respect, it must be like B in other respects.
This is formally known as the Fallacy of False
Analogy, and informally as the Fallacy of Making
Stupid Mistakes. In the case of the brain, it can
lead one -- not necessarily the people I was talking
with -- to think that the Net might itself be
conscious. While that might be *suggested* by a
parallel to the brain, it could only be *known* by
explaining what consciousness is and showing that
the Web has those characteristics. The Argument by
Analogy only takes us so far.
So, yes, the Net is like the brain, and it's like
the nervous system, and it's like the body, and it's
like forty jugglers playing checkers with three
blind monkeys. Some of these analogies have more
points of similarity than others, but in every case,
we move beyond the perceived similarities to
inductions about other properties at peril of
blinding ourselves -- sort of like shining the
flashlight of knowledge into our own eyes.
Had the guys I'd been talking with been making that
particular mistake, I might have won the argument.
Instead, I had to settle for learning a whole lot.
Damn! I hate when that happens!
David Weinberger writes JOHO and is one of the Ringleaders of cluetrain.com,
a manifesto of web ethics. He also provides strategic marketing
consulting to high-tech companies, writes for several magazines
(including Wired)
and is a commentator on NPR's "All Things Considered."
He was, as VP of Strategic Marketing, one of the shapers of Open
Text's intranet strategy. David sits on several conference boards
and is a member of AIIM's Emerging Technology Advisory Group. Reach
him at self@evident.comThe Author