One of the new forms twists the Q&A format into
something novel. Take a look at:
This is AnswerPoint at AskJeeves, a site powered by
Quiq. (Are we that desperate for names already?)
Here visitors can post any question they want, and
anyone on the planet can choose to answer it. Quiq
(www.quiq.com) is actually aiming at the corporate
intranet market where there is some form of control
over the quality of the questions and answers -- see
http://askus.chipcenter.com for an example -- and
the Jeeves site is really just a "proof of concept"
and a way of making some marketing noise. Still, it
makes for an oddly interesting site.
I spoke with Kartik Ramakrishnan, one of Quiq's
founders. Here is an edited Q&A with him:
JOHO: How did Quiq come about?
KR: I was in IT for half dozen years. I'm
passionate about information management. But I
also went to business school. Watching the Net, I
was interested in how online communities can add
value to a corporation. So I formed QUIQ with my
brother, Raghu Ramakrishnan, a Professor of
Computer Sciences at The University of Wisconsin-
Madison, who has a keen interest in Information
Management as well.
JOHO: Why a question-answer format?
KR: It's a basic human instinct. When we need
help, we turn around and ask questions. We wanted
to make it simple for other participants to share
answers.
JOHO: What's different about the Q&A format?
KR: As soon as AnswerPoint was deployed, we saw
that so much of the user experience is determined
by the presentation modality. And there's a
temporal element of information. If a question
doesn't get answered in 3 days, the chances of it
getting answered decreases exponentially. It gets
lost. Usability studies show that. We want to
resurface the older questions.
JOHO: Are these sessions moderated?
KR: Lightly. One reason questions don't get
answered is because the people who looked at it
thought it was superficial or not worthy of an
answer. The moderator can raise worthwhile
questions again. Also, they can watch for people
using excessive profanity. And, the moderator can
re-categorize a question if the person asking it
put it in the wrong bin.
JOHO: Good, because I noticed at the Jeeves site
that the questions in the Travel->Airlines
category were wildly off base. There are questions
such as:
"how do i deal with my 13 year old daughter?"
"how many years is"four score and seven"."
"where can i find a coleslaw reciepe"
"Can blondes tell when lighting will strike
before it does?"
KR: That's because we default to Airlines->Travel
if you don't categorize your question. We're
fixing that.
JOHO: Too bad. It's very amusing. Does your system
notice if someone has already asked a similar
question?
KR: Not at the Jeeves site, but our core product
offering does. We have developed a similarity
search algorithm to identify prior similar
contributions.
JOHO: What has the Jeeves site taught you that you
hadn't anticipated?
KR: We need to provide a way to enable people to
thank answerers. Instead, people use an answer to
write a thank-you. So, a question might have five
answers, but two or three of them are thank-yous.
Also, we were surprised that when we launched
AnswerPoint in May, a bunch of people wrote
questions asking why we didn't have a search
capability. We do now, but I was surprised that
they used the system to critique it.
Oh, and as the system was being used initially,
you'd see the same question four or five times.
Interviews showed that people thought they were in
a chat room, so when there was no answer, they did
what you do in a chat: you ask again.
The AnswerPoint site at AskJeeves strikes me
personally as an oddity and not much more. You'd
have to add a whole bunch of features to make it
into anything like an efficient mechanism for
getting answers (and the commercial version of Quiq
seems to have thought this through well). But that's
exactly why I find it so interesting. Take a simple
idea that's suddenly enabled by the Web -- "Ask a
question to the world and see if anyone answers" --
drop it onto a Web site, and see what happens. Will
the "community" of users evolve mechanisms to make
it more useful? Will spontaneous policing erupt?
Will it turn into chat? Into comedy? Into a flame
fest? Will it fall on its face? Who knows ... so
let's give it a try.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why I love the
Web.