Measuring the ROIs of Intranets: Mission Possible?
Toby Ward, Prescient Digital Media
11/08/2002
Printer Friendly Version
There is a lot of hype surrounding ROI (return on
investment). Everyone and their ASP are trumpeting the benefits of intranet
applications and portals. Truth be told, measuring the ROI of an intranet
appears to be more art than science. Few organizations are actually measuring
an intranet’s benefit in terms of dollars and cents (or pounds and pence).
As I wrote in my first article on
the subject earlier last year (Measuring
the Dollar Value of Intranets), there
is no ‘magic bullet’ to appraise the dollar value of an intranet. Measuring
ROI of a corporate intranet or portal is, at best, an imperfect science. In
fact, it is impossible to measure an intranet’s exact dollar value.
Although measuring the precise return
on investment may not be possible, more organizations are, nevertheless, attempting
to quantify both potential and existing ROI.
While technology stalwarts such as
Cisco and Oracle have made big strides in appraising (largely for marketing
purposes and bragging rights) the dollar value and performance of their
existing intranets, few others have done any extensive measurement.
To better understand how
organizations value and measure the ROI of their intranets, Prescient Digital Media
partnered with the Katz School of Business
at the University of Pittsburgh to conduct an extensive, but voluntary,
study of willing organizations. The first part of a two-part survey was
conducted in the spring and summer of this year (2002) through an online survey
tool. While the study is not a scientific sample of a specific audience, the
respondents were a mixture of intranet managers, consultants and readers of
Intranet Journal. This diverse group of people offered unique intelligence into
the minds of organizations and professionals operating corporate intranets.
Two-hundred and seventy-five (275)
survey participants were asked to rank in order of importance almost 70
different intranet investment benefits organized according to 12 broad
categories including:
1.
Hard Costs
2.
Sales
3.
Communications
4.
Competitiveness
5.
Application Access
6.
Infrastructure
utilization
7.
Collaboration
8.
Time To Market (Cycle
Time)
9.
Customer Service
10. Human Resources
11. Procurement
12. Content management
The findings were somewhat
surprising: softer, harder to measure benefits such as competitiveness,
communications and content management
(the big ‘C’s’) were rated the most important. Traditional areas of
focus for ROI benefits, including procurement, sales and time to market were
rated among the lowest benefit categories.
|
Most important benefit categories
|
|
- Enhanced
competitiveness
|
90%
|
- Content
management
|
87%
|
- Enhanced
communications
|
87%
|
- Hard cost
reduction
|
86%
|
- Enhanced
customer service
|
85%
|
|
Least important benefit categories
|
|
- Enhanced
procurement (eProcurement)
|
63%
|
- Reduced
cycle time (time to market)
|
71%
|
- Enhanced
infrastructure utilization
|
75%
|
- Enhanced
human resources
|
77%
|
- Sales
process enhancement
|
81%
|
“I’m not that surprised,” says David Yockelson, an
executive vice-president and director with
META Group, a technology research and analysis firm. “The value of the
intranet to me is going to be more around productivity and soft costs. My
expectations are more about communicating more freely, time savings, and
information availability rather than sales and hard cost savings.”
When survey participants were asked to rank specific line
item benefits (almost 70 in all), access to and increased sharing and accuracy
of information led the benefit parade. The lowest ranking benefits related to
procurement and time to market.
|
Most important ROI benefits
|
|
- Improved
information sharing (customer svc.)
|
97%
|
- Enhanced
communications and information sharing (communications)
|
95%
|
- Increased
consistency of info (customer svc.)
|
94%
|
- Increased
accuracy of info (customer svc.)
|
93%
|
- Reduced or
eliminated processing
|
93%
|
- Easier
organizational publishing
|
92%
|
|
Least important ROI benefits
|
|
- Reduced
capital cost by using ASP
|
43%
|
- Reduced
reliance on proprietary standards (vs. open stds.)
|
54%
|
- Reduced
inventory
|
55%
|
- Increased
collaboration w/ vendors reducing time
|
55%
|
- Wider
marketing reach (Internet v. EDI & Catalogues)
|
58%
|
- Increased
control over purchasing process
|
63%
|
Again, specific benefits relate to customer service,
communication and content management – access to and accuracy of information.
While the results may be somewhat unexpected given the emphasis on softer
benefits, the results were appreciated by some of the pundits.
Yet, as many readers and
intranet managers can attest, executives want to see hard savings. While soft
benefits can produce some ‘wow’ numbers, including millions of dollars
attributed to time saved (improved productivity), corporate bean counters want
to see cold, hard numbers.
“What is more convincing?
Clearly the hard cost savings,” Yockelson says. “Nobody wants to hand out money
for anything – times are tight. If you can’t justify it, it won’t happen.
They’re (executives) bristling at any costs.”
Part II of the intranet investment study is examining where organizations are measuring value and
what ROI they’re finding. Your participation is requested in developing the
most accurate picture on intranet investment value. Readers are encouraged to
partake by completing
the online survey. All participants will receive full copies of the
complete research and be eligible to win cash, a PDA or University of
Pittsburgh prize package. Findings will also be published here at approximately
the New Year.
A former journalist and a regular e-business columnist and
speaker, Toby Ward is a senior intranet consultant and the founder of Prescient
Digital Media. For a one-day evaluation and benchmarking consultation, or a
copy of the free white paper, Intranet ROI, visit www.IntranetInsight.com.
Is Your
Intranet Headed for Extinction? (Part I)
All too often, an Intranet
can become a 'political football' causing people to lose interest, and budget
to be sucked into a project that will ultimately fail. A look at some of the
things you can do to make sure that your Intranet doesn't go the way of the
Dodo.
Planning
for Success (Is Your Intranet Headed for Extinction? (Part II)
Complex and expensive,
intranets are no longer relegated to “just-another-IT-project” status within
the highly competitive corporate hierarchy. The rigor and execution required to
build and maintain a successful intranet is massive. Planning is perhaps the most
important step of all.
The
Search Isn’t Broken, We’re Broken (Part I)
One of the major and universal frustrations
heard from Internet and intranet users alike is that corporate search engines
are generally ineffective. But, are search engines the real problem, or is the
issue more complex?
The Search Isn’t Broken, We’re Broken (Part II)
Information overload is eroding employee
productivity. Part II of how search effectiveness can be enhanced by people
processes and rules, and examines how today's search challenges can be met by
using a taxonomy and effective meta tagging.
Measuring
the Dollar Value of Intranets (Part I)
Measured
intranet ROI benefits (Part II)